2.0 The Water Factor: The Indispensable Matrix of Life

2.1 The Foundational Importance of Water

The availability of water is arguably the single most important factor governing the form and function of terrestrial plants. As the pioneering ecologist E. Warming stated in 1909, “no other influence impresses its mark to such a degree upon the internal and external structures of the plant as does the amount of water present.” This profound influence stems from the unique and multifaceted roles water plays within the plant at every level of organization.

1. As a Solvent System: Water is the universal solvent in which mineral nutrients are dissolved in the soil for uptake by roots and in which the biochemical reactions of life occur within plant cells.
2. As a Dispersion Medium: Within the protoplasm, water serves as the medium for the complex colloidal systems—suspensions of proteins and other macromolecules—that are essential for cellular structure and function.
3. In Protein Structure and Function: A close interaction exists between the hydration shell of water molecules surrounding a protein and that protein’s physicochemical properties. The very shape and function of an enzyme can depend on its hydration state.
4. As a Raw Material in Photosynthesis: Water is a direct chemical reactant in photosynthesis, providing the electrons and protons used to convert light energy into chemical energy.
5. As a Raw Material in Hydrolytic Processes: Water is consumed in hydrolysis, the process of breaking down complex molecules like starches and proteins into simpler subunits.
6. In Thermoregulation: Through the process of transpiration, the evaporation of water from leaf surfaces provides a powerful cooling effect, which can be critical for preventing leaves from reaching damagingly high temperatures in direct sunlight.

The influence of water on protein structure is so fundamental that specific molecular models have been developed to explain this interaction in detail.

2.2 The Molecular Architecture of Hydration: The Klotz and Jacobson Models

To fully grasp water’s impact on plant life, we must understand its effects at the molecular level, specifically on the macromolecules that control life’s processes: proteins and DNA.

The Klotz (1958) model for protein hydration proposes that protein molecules in the cell are surrounded by “hydration shells” of highly structured, “lattice-ordered water.” These shells are thought to function like “ice-shells” that maintain the protein in its active, three-dimensional configuration. According to this model, external factors can alter this shell and thereby affect protein function: heat is thought to reduce the extent of the ice-shell, lower temperatures are thought to increase its thickness, and urea, a known denaturing agent, is believed to break down the water envelope’s structure. This model provides a compelling explanation for the effects of water stress. A reduction in cellular hydration would logically disrupt this ice-shell, altering protein conformation and function, which is consistent with observed increases in the viscosity of protoplasm under water stress.

Similarly, the Jacobson (1953) model for DNA hydration presents evidence for an ordered-water lattice surrounding DNA molecules. Jacobson hypothesized that this ice-shell facilitates the low-energy separation of the two DNA chains during replication, a process fundamental to cell division and growth.

While these models remain influential frameworks for thought (Stocker, 1960; Slatyer, 1967), it is important to view them as hypotheses. If they are indeed correct, they provide a powerful mechanistic link between a general environmental condition—water deficiency—and its widespread, disruptive effects on all physiological processes. Because DNA directs protein synthesis and proteins (as enzymes) catalyze virtually all metabolic reactions, any disruption to their structure and function due to dehydration will have profound consequences. These molecular-level disruptions manifest as observable impacts on the growth and development of the whole plant.

2.3 Water Stress and Its Impact on Plant Growth and Metabolism

Changes in water availability, from slight deficits to severe stress, translate directly into measurable changes in plant growth, cellular processes, and metabolic function.

The relationship between available soil water and plant growth is critical. While some have suggested that a slight lowering of soil water below field capacity can stimulate growth (Buckman and Brady, 1960), more direct evidence points to a rapid negative impact. For example, research on sunflowers showed a marked reduction in stem elongation well before half the available water was used, and that zero growth results during the use of the last one-fourth of the available water (Blair et al., 1950). As a general rule, a 30-40% reduction in available water is likely to slow growth in most plants.

The most direct effect of a water deficit is on the turgor pressure of individual cells. Reduced turgor has two immediate consequences: it limits cell enlargement, the primary mechanism of plant growth, and it causes stomatal closure. As guard cells lose turgor, the stomata (pores on the leaf surface) close, which reduces water loss through transpiration. However, this also reduces the intake of CO₂, severely limiting photosynthesis. A secondary effect of reduced transpiration is that leaf temperatures can rise to potentially detrimental levels (Slatyer, 1967).

Water deficits affect cell division less than cell enlargement (Slatyer, 1967). However, the impact is still significant. Studies on water-stressed tomato leaves showed that the amount of DNA remained constant, whereas it increased steadily in control leaves, indicating that chromosomal multiplication had ceased (Gates and Bonner, 1959). Similar findings in radish cotyledons confirmed that water stress reduced the rate of DNA increase (Gardner and Nieman, 1964).

Water stress also disrupts RNA metabolism. In tomato leaves, stress prevented any net increase in RNA. The water stressed leaves were able to incorporate P32-labeled phosphate into RNA apparently at the same rate as in control leaves. Researchers therefore concluded that the rate of RNA destruction must have increased (Gates and Bonner, 1959). This was supported by Kessler’s (1961) report that drought stress caused a decrease in RNA content and a marked increase in the activity of RNase, the enzyme that breaks down RNA.

The impact of water stress on photosynthesis is multifaceted. While water is a raw material for the process, its primary influence is twofold: (1) stomatal closure reduces the supply of CO₂, and (2) water deficits have a direct negative effect on the biochemical processes of photosynthesis. Indeed, some research suggests that the rate of photosynthesis is more closely related to the water content of the leaf itself than to stomatal capacity (Gates, 1964), a conclusion that aligns logically with the Klotz model of protein hydration.

As reported by Gates (1964), prolonged water stress triggers a cascade of metabolic failures:

• Respiration rate initially accelerates, then declines.
• Starch is hydrolyzed, and sucrose content first increases, then declines.
• Protein synthesis is impaired.
• Active proteolysis (protein breakdown) occurs, especially in older leaves.
• Ultimately, if protoplasmic desiccation reaches critical levels, cell and organism death will follow.

Having examined the effects of a water deficit, we now turn to the opposite extreme: the physiological consequences of excess water.

2.4 The Effects of Excess Water: Flooding and Anoxia

An excess of water in the soil can be as physiologically challenging as a deficit. The primary problem caused by flooding is the creation of anaerobic (low-oxygen) conditions for the roots, as water displaces air from soil pores.

Research by Crawford and Tyler (1969) revealed that flood-intolerant and flood-tolerant species exhibit distinctively different metabolic responses to these conditions.

• In flood-intolerant species, flooding leads to an increased rate of glycolysis, the induction of alcohol dehydrogenase, and the production of toxic acetaldehyde and ethanol.
• In flood-tolerant species, malic acid accumulates. This represents a key adaptation, as malic acid can accumulate in much greater quantities than ethanol without causing cellular damage and also helps maintain the cell’s electrical neutrality.

From the molecular integrity of proteins to the growth of the whole organism, water’s central role in dictating plant survival and function is clear across its entire spectrum of availability. We will now consider another primary environmental regulator, temperature.

——————————————————————————–